>>See above ohci.o whoudl do it. > > FWIW, I agree - IMHO the 'ideal' naming would be "ehci.o", "uhci.o", > and "ohci.o". Let the 2 uhcis get named "uhci-<whatever>.o" until a > decision is made, then rename the winner to "uhci.o". > > Adding "usb-" or "-hcd" is just baggage to the name.
I'd go for this too, if it weren't for the fact that we already have one "uhci.o" and reusing that name would lead to confusion. The "ohci1394.o" module is sufficiently distinct from the USB world that I don't see that as a problem. - Dave _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
