Really, the 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' issue is two-fold.  It's both a
locking issue and a queueing issue.

Any solution we implement really should address both aspects.

Matt

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 05:53:21PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > On Sat, May 25, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > There's the much discussed USB storage bulk/control problem
> > > > which is a slightly different, but still related locking issue.
> > > 
> > > Can you tell me all about it? Or give pointers?
> > > 
> > > [2.5.18 hangs, 2.5.18 with 2.5.15 usr/storage fails with uhci
> > > but works with alternate uhci; it smells a bit like a locking
> > > problem; plan to look at it further soon]
> > 
> > It's probably not related to the issue you're having.
> > 
> > Basically, you can't do a control transfer in between a bulk transfer to
> > a USB storage device. It's apparentely in the specs.
> > 
> > In the real world, it's something that doesn't happen.
> 
> But very easy to reproduce by constantly running 'cat' on 
> /proc/bus/usb/devices :)
> 
> I think queueing in the USB core is the best thing, not in the HCD or 
> the hcd.c code (this after staring at the Cypress HCD that was released
> last week...)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

DP: And judging from the scores, Stef has the sma...  
T:  LET'S NOT GO THERE!
                                        -- Dust Puppy and Tanya
User Friendly, 12/11/1997

Attachment: msg06860/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to