Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 16:19 schrieb David Brownell:
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >>>I agree. But usbcore should help as far as possible.
> >>
> >>What were you thinking would transform the "device model" level
> >>suspend/resume calls into USB level ones? :)
> >
> > OK, but where do we handle the case where resumption is impossible
> > because the device has been unplugged ?
>
> If that's not already handled, it'd be a bug in the hub driver.
Well, how will we handle it with respect to the resume function ?
Do we report failure if there's no longer a device at the physical
location ? IMHO we do.
Do we have checks in the core for identity, or do we leave that
to the driver ? I am not sure.
> >>>>For example, suspending a bus-powered hub would need to morph into
> >>>>disconnecting the devices it could no longer power ... and in your
> >>>>case, suspending a network device that discards its firmware would
> >>>>also need to morph into a disconnect.
> >>>
> >>>That's exactly what you must _not_ do, you need to retain the
> >>> information which devices was on which port to resume correctly.
> >>
> >>Why would that be? In those cases, the device MUST re-enumerate from
> >>scratch, there will be no USB state to resume. In those cases the
> >>devices can't suspend; they can only disconnect/reconnect.
> >>
> >>And it'd be pointless, since if any device driver wants to save
> >>information about devices across reconnects -- like usb-storage does
> >>today -- it has all the tools it needs to do that already. There's
> >>no need to bloat the core with such stuff.
> >
> > That is not the entire truth.
> > The hub will be told to resume first. If we than scan the physical bus
> > and initiate initialisation of the devices found, there'll be chaos
> > once the "driverfs" layer tells devices to resume.
>
> You said "initiate initialisation"; that's normally called "enumeration".
> Which by definition is NOT done for a USB device being resumed!!!!
Now I am puzzeled. There must be some misunderstanding.
Could you please outline, how we deal with a resumption
if the devices lost power under the new scheme ?
> > The point of suspend/resume cycles is that the system is restored
> > to the state it had. IP, mac, filtering etc... must be restored, not only
> > names.
>
> Then there's always reality to deal with. Like when a network link gets
> removed during suspend.
Yes, that should concern the network layer, not a device driver.
But the device driver must reset MAC and IP at least.
> > In fact, if we have persistent names we don't need to care about names.
>
> Erm, that doesn't make sense. Having them persistent means someone is
> caring a heck of a lot about names and assignment policies.
We meaning device driver maintainers ;-)
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
