On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:48:33AM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote: > Are there any migration plans to make the various BitKeeper > repositories for USB inherited from the official BitKeeper repos? I'm > trying to setup a development environment that is cloned from the > official linux-2.4 repo but still has the updates from the usb-2.4 > repo. I guess the only way to do that is to export patches from the > usb-2.4 repo and import those patches into my linux-2.4 repo.
Yes, that's the only way to do this right now, sorry. > Is there a better way to setup a development environment using > BitKeeper for USB? Hm, do you _really_ want to live off of Marcelo's and Linus's BK trees? I've tried it, and it's pretty hard at times :) The main reason the USB bk trees are not based off of the "official" bk trees, is they have been around much longer than the official ones. Personally I also find it much easier to work day to day off of just the -pre increments, rather than pulling in 50+ changesets a day. It's also easier to generate clean patches that can be applied to the official bk trees this way. And most of the time, I don't want to send all of the changes that I have in the USB trees to Marcelo and Linus, since bk doesn't have the ability to pick and choose what changesets to push upward, we (or I) need a separate tree to work out of. But if this doesn't work for you, please let me know and I'll see what I can do. What kind of USB development were you looking to do? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
