On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:24:54PM -0700, Christopher Hoover wrote: > > Would you mind making up a patch against a clean 2.5.20 (or > > my usb-2.5 bk tree) with this change. > > > > I don't know if the ARM group wants to add this to their > > tree, but I'm trying to remove the USB ARM portions from > > their tree, so they don't have to maintain them anymore :) > > If rmk is going to pull the usb sources from you (or indirectly via a > fast path to Linus) -- then I'll cut something against 2.5.20. > > But before I do that, is the gist of the patch OK? I'm thinking > specifically the export of those symbols out of usb/core/hcd.c. The > only alternative is to put the SA-1111 glue in usb/core/hcd.c. That > seems wrong or at least overkill. (In fact I would rather see the pci > stuff split out of hcd.c -- that way the SA-1111 glue will always have > the symbols and hooks it needs.)
I would _much_ rather see the pci specific pieces of hcd.c split out into a separate file (hcd-pci.c?) If you do that, does your patch get easier? And I'm trying to remove the USB specific pieces from rmk's tree, to relieve that burden from him (and allow the usb group to make changes easier), so a patch against 2.5.20 would be nice. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
