Am Montag, 10. Juni 2002 19:46 schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:33:18PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > this change set against 2.4 introduces a #define to be used by the
> > driver who are concerned by this issue.
>
> Can we wait abit for this please? Defining it to SMP_CACHE_BYTES is
> counter-intuitive since these machines don't do SMP. And this isn't
> just a USB problem either, USB is just the current good example.
Hi,
well I doubt that Marcello will delay 2.4.20 long for a problem only
a few minor architectures suffer. Yet I have a soft spot for those little
machines ;-)
Secondly this is the reason I put a comment on the define. The definite
name will eventually come from someone else, as it's arch dependent.
A define to DMA_ALIGNED by David's suggestion seems very intuitive
to me and a new name means that it can be quickly changed should that
be needed.
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
