On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:15:49PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
<...>
> Umm, I didn't say usb-uhci.c shouldn't be simpler. In fact, I think
> every single time I've ever said anything about usb-uhci.c, I've said it
> should be simpler.
simple != correct. Maybe it doesn't win a beauty award, but it works very
reliably.
And regarding the "arbitrary processing limits": I never trust hardware
_AND_ software. I've used enough drivers (from network to DVB), which
sometimes decided to have an infinite loop in the interrupt. I doubt that
anyone had a performance penalty with these limits...
--
Georg Acher, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.in.tum.de/~acher/
"Oh no, not again !" The bowl of petunias
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kidding.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
