Am Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 23:45 schrieben Sie:
> > is there a deeper reason for the TDs being allocated under a spinlock?
>
> The presence of an annoying hashtable needed for bus_to_virt()
> style mappings. Minimally, stuffing the hashbuckets needs to
> be reentrant, and that's done as part of allocation.
This is a problem for ensuring that storage makes progress.
Could allocation be divorced from hashing them ?
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
