On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:24:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Such stuff could be layered at first, too. Though I suspect > that a clean treatment of transfer buffers would lead to one > new_urb() call for control, another for bulk/interrupt, and one > more for ISO. Eventually, a "pipe-free" API would be nice; > and there's no reason endpoints shouldn't point to devices, > getting rid of at least that parameter.
I don't know about that. The "pipe" api is quite nice and comfortable. Remember, an endpoint _is_ just a one way pipe. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
