> > Well the API seems to still be moving as of 2.5.36 > > Heh, it's my goal to change it for every kernel release, to keep > everyone on their toes :)
Well, if it keeps you happy :) > > > What is the 2nd argument of usb_register_root_hub supposed to be? > > I was reading the code and it shows it as the parent, but what is the > > meaning of a parent of a root hub? > > Whatever the root hub is attached to. For PCI based host controllers, > it's the pci device. For other types of controlers, it is whatever they > are connected to. If they aren't connected to anything, but just hang > out in memory space, it's null. For UM, I would think this would be > NULL. > > This is to position the USB bus in the proper device tree. Ah, yes... I had seen it going off with struct device but was uncear if NULL was even a legal value, But not understanding its purpose, and seeing the SA1111 case go off to a undefined value, I figured, I had better ask rather then make what was looking like a dumb assumption. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
