Matthew Dharm wrote: > Hrm... > > Well, I can try this as an experiment... just assume that the clear halt > has worked... tho the logs suggest that it didn't.
I'm not sure I see what you're saying. I think the correct response from device+core+hcds is quite typically going to be reporting -EPIPE to drivers trying to clear a control halt. It indicates "there was no control halt" ... not "the clear didn't work". - Dave >> >>I think that means that some drivers, maybe even usb-storage, might need >>to be able to clear halts on the control pipe, if they talk to devices that >>are not "well designed". BUT any driver that tries should expect that most >>devices return protocol stalls (-EPIPE) when asked to clear halts. >> >>Matt, does this help resolve your issue? >> >>- Dave >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
