Pieter Nagel wrote:
...
> However, I believe for 2.5 the loop should be rewritten as retry loop,
> and the function should immediately return whatever it reads, like the
> majority of drivers do. As a side effect, the number of retries on
> TIMEOUT/NAK would change, so the TIMEOUT values for various scanners
> would need to be retuned based on experience.
The scanner module does blocking IO. You cannot change it to any kind of
nonblocking IO without breaking applications. It would be wise to ask
application developers first, e.g. on the SANE developer mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Regards,
Stephan
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
