On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:14:22AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > >What about DEVPATH, since that's what it is, right? > > Well, it's different from usb_device->devpath ... devpath is just > one component of the KFS path. One that's repeated because of > that requirement that names assigned by a bus be unique across > the whole system, making it easier to automate that symlinking. :) > > It's not the only filesystem path used to access the device. > Would using KFS_DEVICE really be a problem?
No, but DEVPATH is nicer looking imho :) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
