On Sat, Oct 12, 2002, Dan Streetman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'm a moron - the first patch I sent was corrupted - when I diff'ed 
> the trees, I sent the patch through "grep -v Only" to remove Only in ... 
> lines.  I forgot that would remove source code lines with Only also!  
> anyway, this is the first patch, that really applies this time.  Tested it 
> myself.  Sorry for all the trouble.

Not a problem. "grep -v ^Only" will be safe :)

BTW - I did some searching through the specs, and while it doesn't
guarantee much to control transfers, it does specifically mention (5.5.4):

"If there are control transfers pending for multiple endpoints, control
transfers for the different endpoints are selected according to a fair
access policy that is Host Controller implementation-dependent".

It also goes on to say that control is "best effort", etc.

However, with depth first on control, it can definately be construed as
not being fair. So, switching low speed control back to breadth is
probably the best thing to do, like in your original patch.

JE



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to