Hello David, On Sunday 13 October 2002 22:04, David Brownell wrote: > When you say it does not work, do you mean you've been sitting on a > bug report all this while? Because I don't recall *EVER* hearing about > any problems in the bandwidth reservation code. Not one.
Bandwidth reservation is useless if there is enough bandwith for all... So bugs for this item will be very rare, yes... I see that you wanted to make the USB API as simple as possible for driver programmers. This is a good thing. In 2.4.x, all endpoints with reservation (INT and ISO) have only constant sizes. For INT OUT endpoints, this was not acceptable because there are devices with uses variable data block length. Will the 2.6.x API be better for device driver writers? Most of the problem solvers are "not merged in", as you say. What about the upcoming 2.5.x feature freeze? best regards Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
