On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> Overall, I agree with the concept of the patch. I wonder though if we
> could do it without burdening all the callers of device_register() to
> first call device_initialize(). Well, tastefully at least.
I'd rather add device_add() and make device_register() call device_initialize()
followed by device_add()...
BTW, my variant of the same beast is on
ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro/O/O142-device_add-C42
with uses in O14[3-6]* in the same place...
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
