On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:05:45PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Anyway, I think I've handled everything that has been sent to me, with
> > the exception of Oliver's change configuration patch, and my previous
> > device reference count patch. If I've missed anything else, please let
> > me know.
>
> Not strictly 2.5, but anyway:
>
> Any news about the status of the USB scanner driver? Is it maintained
> and can the bugs mentioned in my mail "Status of USB scanner driver"
> be fixed? Is Brian Beattie subscribed to this list (cc'ed this time)?
I don't know what's up with Brian, still around?
> Anyone looked at the patches? At least for the users of gt6801 based
> scanners, it seems to work. No bug reports until now. And by the way,
> scanning for scannings is much faster with the pach (0.5 seconds/15
> seconds).
I've glanced at the patches, but not really paid attention to them that
much.
> Does it make sense to send more patches, e.g. when I get
> vendor/product ids for new scanners? As I wrote, I vote for keeping
> the kernel scanner driver at least in 2.4.
No one answered my question last time which was:
Can the scanner driver be deleted in 2.5, as everything now
works properly using libusb from SANE?
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
