Hi,
this is a real case of mail interleave. I've just sent a new version to the
list. Could you look through that, too ?
Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2002 21:56 schrieb David Brownell:
> The stuff below should only be available to other usbcore
> components; no device driver should ever call this stuff.
> It belongs in "hcd.h" not "usb.h".
I see. Are you sure about usb_physical_set_conf() ?
There might be strange vendor specific webcams or such things that
abuse configurations.
> It'd be good if we could set config to zero ... that's the
> same state as a device is in after set_address is called.
> We don't need it yet ... but it's a good capability to have.
> A device in that state would have no interfaces ... just
> begging to have some user mode tool set the configuration.
> Easy to test this mode with off-the-shelf devices, too.
Interessting suggestion, but where is the benefit of this over switching over
from the default configuration?
> Other than that, it looked nice as I browsed it. Though it
> should have a comment about how probing drivers and setting
> the configuration are mutually exclusive.
OK.
Thanks
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
