On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote:

>On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> 
>> This patch sets up the URB interval correctly when using interrupts via 
>> usbfs.  This is finally possible since the automagic resubmission is gone.
>
>Hm, I don't understand, what does this patch do that couldn't be done
>before?  Oh, we were forced to do "one shot" interrupt urbs before,
>right?  How does this patch change the way userspace programs that
>were used to the old way work?

There is no change to userspace programs.  Before the interval was set to 
0 (one-shot), this changes usbfs to use the endpoint's requested interval 
(bInterval).


-- 
Dan Streetman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------
186,272 miles per second:
It isn't just a good idea, it's the law!



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to