On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:19:27PM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:22, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:07:50PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > > It's a matter of avoiding typecasts everywhere.  We get a void*, and
> > > we send void* on to other places.
> >
> > Yeah, looking at struct urb, transfer_buffer is a void *, so nevermind,
> > I'll take this patch.  Sorry for the noise :)
> It's really a bunch of bytes, right? So u8 * would be a better description?

Yes it would.

> Will you take a cleanup that does this for 2.5?

Yes I would, that would be great.  It would also be interesting to see
if anything odd falls out because of it :)

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to