On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:25:01PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > Any particular reason for this?
My previous LSM example module patch added EXPORT_SYMBOL() for these lists. As these symbols previously were only accessable from within the kernel, I realized that I should probably mark them _GPL() to keep the same "kind" of access. But I realized this after I sent the original patch to Linus. This patch fixes that. Are there any objections to useing _GPL() for these symbols? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
