On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:20:02PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > This patch converts most common hub diagnostics to use the > device model diagnostic macros ... not all, someone should > reduce the number of err() strings for "bogus hub" cases, > and ideally streamline some of the dozen or so "here's what's > special about this new hub" dbg() messages. > > So the messages become more useful: they id the port (and > implicitly the device) involved, using a kernel-wide standard > convention. Size overhead is smaller too. > > For folk running with USB debugging enabled, it also cuts > the useless chatter on connections by deleting the per-poll > success messages and a partial dup message when things change. > And it deletes a newish diagnostic on a (non-hub) unlink path. > > It also makes Pete's new debounce message use the right > port number -- one-based, not zero-based. > > My main issue with this patch is that it doesn't change > more messages, but it seems reasonable to merge it anyway. > Comments?
Looks ok to me. Johannes, are you ok with the few debug messages that Dave took out? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
