On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk: > > links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion, > > not technical issues). > > All usb patches that are sent to Marcelo and Linus are posted to the > linux-usb-devel mailing list as responses to the BK posting. I'm not > sending them to lkml as that would just be annoying to the 99% of the > people on there. > > I also put the patches sent in patch form in the: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/usb/... > directories. > > Is that sufficient for those not willing/able to use bk?
Yes, very. I missed the patch location, I don't follow the usb-devel list. -- bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
