> + { USB_DEVICE(0x0547, 0x2131) }, /* BayCom DABUSB prototype (4 keys)(dumb) */
This isn't the vendor ID for _anything_ from BayCom;
It's the ID for the original EZ-USB chip: the An2131.
So it should be deleted from "dabusb".
We periodically get complaints from people (including
Cypress) who point out that "dabusb" should not be
binding to every an2131 chip that happens to enumerate
without an EEPROM giving it new vendor and chip IDs.
> + { USB_DEVICE(0x0547, 0x9999) }, /* BayCom DABUSB prototype (4 keys) (downloaded */
Same thing. Vendor ID 0x0547 is Cypress (originally,
AnchorChips). I don't know that they use product id
0x9999 for anything yet, bu that's _their_ choice.
If "BayCom" uses those IDs in its lab for its own
prototyping efforts, I have no problem with it.
Such IDs don't belong in any standard kernel.
- Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
