I believe && is meant here, but I cannot test it. This is against 2.5.63
regards
john
--- linux-linus/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c 2003-01-10 21:12:07.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c 2003-02-26 18:36:34.000000000 +0000
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@
}
interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&rio-> wait_q,
NAK_TIMEOUT);
continue;
- } else if (!result & partial) {
+ } else if (!result && partial) {
obuf += partial;
thistime -= partial;
} else
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
