> > > I still do not want/understand the need to create new ioctls for this > > > driver. If you rip that part out of the patch, I'd be glad to take the > > > rest of it, and then we can work on the ioctl issue together. > > > > Why don't you want the ioctls? Is there another way to communicate > > with the driver for tuning options? > > sysfs for 2.5, and procfs for 2.4. > > Also, I would really like to see this patch in 2.5 first, before 2.4, as > new things should not really go into 2.4 without being tested out for a > while by everyone in 2.5.
Ok, that (procfs) is an option if you really don't like the ioctls. My problem: I need this patch in 100+ machines running 2.4.20 or newer in about 2-3 months. Any chance it will make it into 2.4.21+ if I use procfs? Thomas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
