On 24 Mar 2003, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > For disk-like media:
> >
> > READ_10
> > WRITE_10
>
> We do about the best we can for read and write. For sd, we gauge the
> size of the command from the size of the medium: <1Gb=> six byte, from
> 1Gb to 2Tb 10 byte, over 2Tb 16 byte, so I think this should all be
> fine.
Really? The code was _supposed_ to always start off with READ/WRITE_10's,
and then fall back to the old READ/WRITE_6 if it gets errors from that. Do
we really have some broken random-number generator semantic still in teh
SCSI layer? That sounds like a piece of crock.
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
