On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:53:30 +0200 Daniele Bellucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Is still needed to implement LP_ABORTOPEN + O_NONBLOCK in usb printer device drive? | (look at usblp.c for TODO) Not my call, but I would say Yes, so that the (parallel) char/lp.c and usb/class/usblp.c behave in the same way on open(). BTW, make changes like this to 2.5.current please, and then backport to 2.4.current if appropriate. -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
