On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, David Brownell wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>
> >>strlcpy?
> >
> >
> > No need, when the length is obviously less.
>
> True, not "necessary" in this case ... but it's still
> IMO a much better practice. And if we're serious about
> rubbing out that family of bugs, we'll just deprecate
> "strncpy" and eventually remove it from the kernel.
>
> What's "obvious" today may be false tomorrow, especially
> after a few rounds of cut/paste/modify.
Yep, i vote ;-) for strlcpy too. Seems cleaner practice to me.
Petko
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
