On Thu 12 June 2003 09:10, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Because you are at it i wish to say that, in my opinion, adding an entry > > to sysctl tables would be more appropriate than playing with ioctl. For > > example, a user/sysadm could set automaticaly LP_ABORTOPEN in any init > > script to avoid to code a program that just set/clear it. Be aware that > > this will break compatibility with parallel printer device drivers where > > such sysctl entry doesn't exist. > > That does make sense, yes. Or they could use tunelp, except that it > has binary ioctl interface problems. Ugh.
we could use use both ioctl and sysctl to set LPABORTOPEN > > >> More comments after I try to test it... > > I'm still trying to see if this patch is useful. ok, no problem... i'll wait. regards Daniele. PGP PKEY http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&op=index ICQ# 104896040 Netphone/Fax 178.605.7063 Homepage http://web.tiscali.it/bellucda ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
