RFC on the following ohci non-pci patch, against 2.4.. The patch has been tested on MIPS only, but it's pretty generic and should work with others arches as long as the right command line parameters are passed.
At a first glance it didn't look problematic, though I wonder if having config options (instead of module options) might not be a better approach, at least to define defaults.
Though I do wonder what the 2.5 version of that patch would look like, and how this plays with the SA-1111 support (which is also non-PCI). The 2.5 kernel has the SA-1111 support "native", while in 2.4 it's in separate patches (like 2.4.19-rmk7).
Also, which OHCI did you test with? I understand that the non-PCI implementations are a bit more variable in quality-of-implementation, so that it might be useful to at least document "worked with these parts".
- Dave
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
