On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 05:42 schrieb David Brownell: > > > > I'd put it in the kernel since the folk who've been most interested > > in having such gadgets need the performance ... they're using > > embedded processors, not all of which have the oomph of a 486/66. > > How about only putting processing READ and WRITE into the kernel > and shunt the rest to user space?
The rest is pretty trivial compared to READ and WRITE (for a minimal implementation, anyway). Also, it's more work to write both a kernel driver component and a user-space component :-) Putting the whole thing in user space would be okay. Presumably I would have to use gadgetfs to communicate with the controller. Where is the gadgetfs source and documentation? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
