Julian Back wrote:
My mass storage driver is intended as a demonstration so I was planning to implement it as a user application using the GadgetFS, is there any reason (other than performance) why I shouldn't do that?
Another demonstration would of course be run NFS in the device, accessing the files from some Linux host.
On the other hand, I'm looking forward to seeing Alan's code.
It should be a bit more usable "out of the box" for talking
to MSFT hosts.
That's the reason I have chosen to implement mass storage - I need to be able to demonstrate the device with a Windows host and mass storage is the only useful gadget that won't require a custom Windows driver.
Julian
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
