On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Roe Peterson wrote: > Actually, it does identify itself as removable - definitely a bug in the > nz90.
> I'm beginning to think this could have something to do with the NZ90 > identifying > itself as an ATA device instead of a transparent scsi device. Here's > the first trace: > > 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: Command INQUIRY (6 bytes) > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: 12 00 00 00 ff 00 76 f6 2b db > 1a c0 > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: Call to > usb_stor_control_msg() returned 12 > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: usb_stor_transfer_partial(): > xfer 255 bytes > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: USB IRQ received for device > on host 1 > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: -- IRQ data length is 2 > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: -- IRQ state is 0 > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: -- Interrupt Status (0x28, 0x0) > Aug 20 14:02:21 tbolt kernel: usb-storage: -- not a command-completion IRQ > > This status (0x28) appears ONLY to happen if unit attention is being raised. Looks like these are a couple of genuine bugs in the NZ90. Too bad :-( Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
