> My feeling is that a reasonably large change may end up being the best > thing to do. In particular, we probably only need to have one QH per > queue, instead of one for each URB. But it'll be a while before that > stuff gets done.
But won't that result in starvation of some endpoints in favour of those with vast numbers of urbs queued on them? At the moment the per-urb QHs mean that the hc works on only one urb per endpoint before moving on to the next endpoint. Ciao, Duncan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
