On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:20:31AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > I'm probably labouring under some fundamental misunderstanding here, > but I'll plow on regardless. > > 83 /* needs to be called with BKL held */ > 84 int usb_probe_interface(struct device *dev) > > is exposed to the driver model. Whilst I've not yet dis-entangled the > call stack that gets here, I can't see where the BKL gets taken for the > store_new_id() case. What is the magical BKL protecting ? > > Is this a problem ?
Hm, I thought we didn't need to do that anymore. And we don't hold the BKL during that call too... I wonder if Oliver remembers... thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
