On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:31:21 -0700 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Randy.Dunlap wrote: | > | > David, changes to gadget API OK? | | I had some most of them along with some unrelated changes; | I'll send them in a separate patch to Greg. and Greg has already applied a different writing_usb_driver.tmpl patch, so that's OK, you can take your own time on these. | But I've got a couple questions about this one, maybe you know the | answers to them: | | > - unsigned no_interrupt : 1, | > - zero : 1, | > - short_not_ok : 1; | > + unsigned no_interrupt:1, | > + zero:1, | > + short_not_ok:1; | | I tried this and it made "no_interrupt" appear in the kerneldoc. | But NOT the other two bits. Is someone fixing kerneldoc bugs, | so that issue can have some useful resolution? Oh, bad. Sorry about that. Not that I know of. | Related question, I'm guessing that having each one on a line | by itself would make kerneldoc happy. But as I recall, that'd | be at the cost of making the bits live in separate words, which | is waste I'd rather avoid ... know if that's true? Yes, if I recall correctly, that would allocate a new <unsigned> for each one instead of a series of bits in one <unsigned>.... -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
