On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:40:29PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > I don't fully understand this business with URB's yet. > I've been reading your USB docs and its becoming clearer, but to be honest > I didn't know if the pointer to the next urb might still be available in a > different context or something. > I noticed that the definitions of the 'urb' structure between 2.4 and 2.6 > have changed quite a bit. > Would the pointer to the next urb be helpful for debugging?
The "next" pointer is gone in 2.6, it's not needed, and it's not coming back :) > Deleting the line is fine by me, I just left it in there incase somebody > wanted to correct it. > > Try this patch. Looks good, I've applied it. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
