On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:41:59AM -0500, Doug Maxey wrote: > > Howdy, > > Did the complete dump of /proc/bus/usb that illustrates the device > tree that is giving me fits ever make it to this list? I can resend > if needed. > > It seems that we have another device, in addition to the TEAC floppy > that has had an unusual_dev entry, this time for the ISC-200. This > device also appears to be somewhat different from the device matched > by the original code. > > Did I ever hear a design choice on how to at least workaround this > issue?
As these devices are showing up to the OS as the same exact device, how do you think this can be worked around? > My current thought is to have a documented config variable that > enables the code to match the devices that are being shipped by IBM > on the particular platform. Is this a reasonable solution? What platform are these devices going to be shipped for? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
