On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:22:27AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Hmm, I just saw that. It's not so much supporting multiple "platforms"
> (which this code has always done) as choosing between the boards at
> runtime, using different GPIOs. So the same kernel might run on an
> h1900, h3900, c750, and so forth -- all wired differently.
>
> I'd like to merge such support, but ... where do the machine_is_xxx()
> macros come from? Grep turned up neither definitions nor declarations.
They are autogenerated from the mach_type database; you can find the
latest one on
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hornemannstraße 12, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
