On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:29:02PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg & Matt: > > I'm not entirely sure about this patch. An earlier patch caused trouble > because it effectively removed the US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY flag for devices with > release number higher than 0x5009. This one might cause problems because > it explicitly goes against the immediately preceding comment in > unusual_devs.h. That comment says that these Casio digital cameras claim > to use the CBI transport when in fact they only use CB. However, there > have been two reports in the last few weeks from people getting the > "unneeded SubClass and Protocol" log messages. One of them was using a > device with release number 0x1000, right at the start of the range. The > other had a device with release number 0x5010, just beyond the end of the > current range. > > Maybe Casio is marketing two different devices with different behaviors > but having the same Vendor, Product, and Release values -- I don't know. > So I think this probably should be applied, but I'm not certain.
Applied, thanks. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
