G. Del Merritt wrote:
I have a simple hotplug script that works under 2.4.20.9; all it does is chmod 0666 "${DEVICE}"

The device name passed for either kernel is the "old style" /proc/bus/usb/blah
name.  When I do an "ls -l" on that file, I see the correct permissions, but
the /sys version of it does not have the right write rights.  Or at least, not
what I expected.

There is no /sys version of any /proc/bus/usb/... file. In fact, sysfs and usbfs don't really have much functional overlap at all. The system is doing exactly what it should.

- Dave




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to