Le ven 07/11/2003 � 09:24, Jens Axboe a �crit : > On Wed, Nov 05 2003, Alan Stern wrote:
> > In any case, it quite likely _does_ point to a driver bug. But since > > sddr09_read_data() was handed this sg entry and didn't change it, if there > > is such a bug it must lie in a higher-level driver. Maybe the scsi layer, > > maybe the block layer, maybe the memory-management system, maybe the file > > system. That was my original point. > > Well, the sg entry looks perfectly valid. And that was my original > point :-). And that is why I said it looks like a driver bug, not in > upper layers. How much memory did the system that crashed have? If the > system has highmem, try testing with scsi_calculate_bounce_limit() > unconditionally returning BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH. The system has 1 GiB of memory, ie just enough to make stuff like radeonfb fail Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
