On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Alan Stern wrote: > I'm not sure whether Jens is objecting to adding the extra member to the > host template or to making the default alignment something other than 512. > Here's my attempt at a compromise patch, which boils the area of > disagreement between Kai and Jens down to a single line of code (plus a > comment). It doesn't change the host template and it shouldn't slow down > any tape I/O programs when using a non-USB device. > Looks very good. Using existing mechanisms is better than adding a new member to a struct.
I tested the patch with a tape and did not find any problems. > If there aren't any more objections to this, I urge James to apply the > SCSI parts to a post-2.6.0-final tree, and likewise for Matt and the USB > part. > As far as I am concerned, please do. -- Kai ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
