Hi Alan, > Does your patch work if you leave out the FIX_INQUIRY flag or is that flag > necessary? Also, do you get any messages in your kernel log about I need to test what happens if I leave out the FIX_INQUIRY flag. If I set this to "0", what will the consequences be in the worst case? Will it corrupt data or will it simply fail to recognize media and stuff like that? I'm just asking what to expect -- as long as it doesn't wreck my camera, I'm fine with testing it. ;-)
> unneeded SubClass or Protocol values in the unusual_devs entry? Finally, I don't get any messages concerning SubClass or Protocol Values (at least not if I plug the camera in, get the SCSI devices, mount it, make file operations on it, umount the device and remove the camera; also, I've made file operations with more than 300 MBs at a time and the camera behaved very well). > does the product ID in your patch select _only_ the RS cameras or would it > mistakenly be applied to the older version cameras as well? Unfortunately I don't have access to one of the older cameras so I can't test it. If I remember correctly, someone once told me that they have different product IDs. However, I'm unable to confirm it. Christian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
