Hello Dave, On Monday 08 December 2003 21:54, David Brownell wrote:
> Re implementation, I'll continue to lobby for simplicity. and immediately followed by: > Drivers can implement interruptible waits themselves, on top of > async unlink. Nothing personal, Dave - but how long will it last until you will accept that making a simple and bullet-proof API for device driver writers is a key to linux USB success? > - URB is inactive. Device driver handles any nuances like > never-used, just-completed, etc. Device driver may submit > it, if it's properly initialized. IMHO, urb_unlink should work on all urbs in a dependable way. No exception. best regards Wolfgang M�es ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
