On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:37:22PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:50:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:55:01PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > > Greg, please apply this patch and remove the raw_bulk.[ch] files.
> > 
> > Ok, I've done this.  But in the future, if you send me a patch that does
> > remove a file, that will work just fine too.  Bitkeeper recognizes that
> > the file disappears properly.
> 
> I had trouble making that go.  I did a 'bk rm' on the files, and then tried
> to export the changeset as a patch, but it didn't show the removal of the
> files...
> 
> Any tips?

I think on older versions of bk (pre 3.0 days) this might not have
worked.  But it does now.  Try the following as an example:

bk rm Makefile
bk citool
(figure out what cset number you just created and replace it with XXX
below)
bk export -tpatch -h -rXXX > ../patch
bk undo -rXXX

../patch should have the removed files in it.

That's how I generated the patch to add to my "patches to eventually
send to Linus after 2.6.0" repository :)

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to