On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 06:56:23PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg: > > Does this mean that the usb-2.5 repository is now essentially moribund?
No, not at all. > Should I clone the bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/usb-devel-2.6 repository and > start using that for my development work? Hm, depends on what you want to track. I didn't pull the USB patches that I sent to Linus into that repo, so you will be missing a lot of real bug fixes. The usb-devel-2.6 tree is for me to hold USB only patches that will be sent to Linus/Andrew after 2.6.0 is out. The usb-2.5 tree is basically my working tree, incorporating all of the latest USB stuff, as well as i2c, pci, pci hotplug, and a number of sysfs/driver model patches that I'm working on, or haven't made it into the main kernel trees yet. Once 2.6.0 is out I'll probably rename this tree, as it's not really the "usb" only tree anymore :) So, I'll still gladly take patches sent to me against either tree, or even a clean kernel.org release. Hope this helps, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
