Hello ,
Previously, when I used kernel 2.4, I reported new device in unusual_devs.h
(05e3,0701).
Now I`m using kernel 2.6.1 and started to get this errors:
        Jan 15 08:47:40 lifebook kernel: usb-storage: This device (05e3,0701,0002 S
06 P 50) has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
        Jan 15 08:47:40 lifebook kernel:    Please send a copy of this message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I removed this entry from unusual_devs.h and stopped to get this errors. Plus
I cheked my drive in packet cd mode and it`s working ok.
This is my syslog with apllied patch:
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: new USB device on port 1,
assigned address 3
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: Bad USB agent invocation
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage
devices Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook /sbin/hotplug: no runnable
/etc/hotplug/scsi_host.agent is installed
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook kernel:   Vendor: SAMSUNG   Model: CD-R/RW SW-248F
Rev: R601 Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook kernel:   Type:   CD-ROM    ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook /sbin/hotplug: no runnable /etc/hotplug/scsi.agent
is installed
        Jan 15 08:57:15 lifebook kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 48x/48x writer cd/rw
xa/form2 cdda tray

As you can see it detects my drive in right way.
I think this entry is obsolete for kernel 2.6.
I attached patch for removing it.
Shoud I send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best regards,
Alexander Oltu.
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h	2004-01-09 08:59:55 +0200
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h	2004-01-15 00:34:25 +0200
@@ -373,13 +373,6 @@
 		US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
 		US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY ),
 
-/* Submitted Alexander Oltu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */
-UNUSUAL_DEV(  0x05e3, 0x0701, 0x0000, 0xffff, 
-		"", 
-		"USB TO IDE",
-		US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_BULK, NULL,
-		US_FL_MODE_XLATE ), 
-
 /* Reported by Peter Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  * Like the SIIG unit above, this unit needs an INQUIRY to ask for exactly
  * 36 bytes of data.  No more, no less. That is the only reason this entry

Reply via email to