On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:57:57PM -0600, Al Borchers wrote: > Greg -- > > Greg KH wrote: > > I agree. We can either use Pete's patch, or work on backporting the 2.6 > > code to 2.4 (no semaphores, and any locking that is needed must be > > handled by the individual drivers.) > > Thanks for the pointer to Pete's patch--I did a quick search > before posting but did not find this. I did not realize the > problem was already so well understood. > > > Which do you feel is the better solution? > > The 2.6 idea that drivers should do their own locking is better.
I agree. Care to do the port? :) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
